Springfree vs ACON

Springfree and ACON are both premium brands, and both cost well above the Australian average. They disagree about what sits under the mat. Springfree uses flexible fibreglass rods and no springs. ACON uses conventional coil springs, with high spring counts aimed at a strong, responsive bounce.

That choice shapes the rest. Springfree's design puts nothing hard at the edge of the jumping surface, and it backs the frame, mat and net with 10-year warranties. ACON matches the 10-year frame warranty but drops to 5 years on the mat and 1 on the net. ACON publishes a 750 kg combined weight rating, the highest of any brand here, though its per-jumper figures of 110 to 120 kg sit close to Springfree's 100 kg on full-size models.

Shapes differ. Springfree makes round, oval and square models, and its largest oval is bigger than anything ACON sells here. ACON makes round models and a 10 × 17 ft rectangle. ACON's range starts lower than Springfree's mid-range but climbs higher at the top.

Choose Springfree if you want the springless design and the same long warranty on every part. Choose ACON if you want a strong spring bounce, a rectangle, or the higher combined weight rating.

Quick verdict

Both are long-term purchases. Choose Springfree if removing springs is the reason for the spend; its warranty also applies to more parts for longer. ACON suits a household that wants performance bounce and will use the trampoline hard, especially with several people on it at once.